Hola a todos y todas
Comparto un texto que forma parte de un capítulo que escribí hace un par de años. Es la primera vez que explicité esto de los Mcguffins, aplicado al contexto educativo. Como veo que varios habéis explorado este tema, me parece oportuno compartirlo.
Está en inglés, pero es mi inglés, o sea sencillito, así que seguro que podréis leerlo bien. Si no fuera así decídmelo y ya vemos otras posibilidades.
El texto de fondo lo tenéis aquí (por cierto no se ve el vídeo que hay mencionado con un enlace, trataré de resolverlo, el autor era un alumno de hace unos seis años, que hizo una aplicación de lo más curiosa).
One
specific way of playing with the generation of contexts with the purpose of
promoting exploration, connection and research processes and its effects on
creating challenge and curiosity for knowing, is what we called the McGuffin
project.
The
McGuffin project was born by chance. It emerged during the subject of “Learning
Disabilities” belonging to the Psycho-Pedagogical Studies, and it is still open
to new applications. It became a joke for labelling some topics discussed
during the classes that shared some particularities:
1. They were neither a central issue of the
subject nor were explicitly stated in the program.
2. Although topics were not a central issue, and
maybe because of this, they called attention on themselves.
3. As an example of their peripheral nature,
they were never completely and exhaustedly covered.
4. Actually they seemed more an excuse to work
something else, a mean to get an end, but a mean that seemed intriguing enough
to evoke interest and attention.
5. They could appear just once or from time to
time as if they wanted to recall their presence. In this sense there were two different
types: occasional McGuffins which appeared just once or transversal ones which
were developed in parallel with the subject.
6. McGuffins helped to start processes of
exploration which led to different places which coincided with explicit goals
of the subject.
7. Many students began to think outside the
class about the nature of the McGuffins and their connection with other
McGuffins or the goals of the subject. It served then to initiate hypothetical
reasoning so typical in abductive thought.
In general
McGuffin helped to gain attention, to evoke questions in the student minds and
to prepare the possibility of connecting classes, concepts and practices. In
essence finally it implied going beyond the content of the subject to promote
something more important, the processes that we were trying to practice as
students of that subject. Generally these processes involved the discussion or
participation of small groups or the whole class as a group. As we realized it
was one way of promoting the work of competences due to it paid attention to
the processes performed by the students instead of contents they had to learn.
Furthermore
McGuffins usually were presented erratically during the classes. For example
after a short or long explanation or the question of one student, the teacher
could add like diminishing its importance:
“well but this is just a McGuffin”.
This short
sentence could call the attention of students towards the previous explanation
in a different way, reframing it as a special explanation, not an ordinary one:
“Is it what?”
Of course
the name of the McGuffin is in itself a strange word for the major part of the
students unless they are interested in the cinema and know the movies of Alfred
Hitchcock. Interviewed in 1966 by François
Truffaut, Alfred Hitchcock illustrated the term "McGuffin"
with this story[1]:
"It might be a Scottish name, taken from a story about two men in a train. One
man says, 'What's that package up there in the baggage rack?' And the other
answers, 'Oh that's a McGuffin.' The first one asks 'What's a McGuffin?' 'Well'
the other man says, 'It's an apparatus for trapping lions in the Scottish Highlands.'
The first man says, 'But there are no lions in the Scottish Highlands,' and the
other one answers 'Well, then that's no McGuffin!' So you see, a McGuffin is
nothing at all."
More
succinctly, Hitchcock defined the McGuffin as the object around which the plot
revolves, it is a plot device that
motivates the characters and advances the story, but has little other relevance
to the story.
For us the
strange name works as an invitation to define it, to explore its meaning, it
suggests a mystery to be resolved (Cialdini, 2005). Instead of the content of
the McGuffin, the idea of McGuffin could be in itself a McGuffin as well. Some
examples of McGuffins worked during our classes are the following:
- The idea of digital immigrant and digital
native (Prensky, 2001), could be connected to our students? Or better said, are
our students digital natives while we as teachers are digital immigrants? How
is this separating us? What could be taken into account of these two ‘cultures’
in order to communicate people belonging to them?
- What is the difference of dynamic VS static
ways of evaluating aptitudes? How can be done something dynamically or
statically?
- What is a process? How is a process related
with the dynamic evaluation? How can we track processes though time when
working with an individual or a group?
- What is an inference? How do we construct
meaning of the world? What does it mean to mean something? How is this related
to deductive, inductive and abductive reasoning? What is abductive reasoning?
What processes are involved?
- What is a context? How many contexts could
we differentiate? How is the context connected to motivation, social skills or
even learning disabilities? What is the connection between context and meaning?
- What is a pattern? Why it was so famous the
sentence of Bateson “the pattern that
connects”? What is the relationship between pattern and process? And with
meaning?
After
reading these few examples of McGuffin you could understand the typical
headache of many students but also the awakening of a new class of wondering
process. As you can also notice the McGuffin are better expressed with questions
which could orient our attention towards a new scenario, a new possibility.
Besides it enhances the need of creating connections. McGuffins are not
isolated structures, neither isolated processes. They can connect with
different McGuffins and above all with the themes, topics and activities worked
and presented during one or more subjects, which are not neither isolated nor
independent. With the purpose of objectifying this dynamic we have discussed
about McGuffin in blogs, forum and wikis[2].
[2] The following links illustrate
attempts to define what a McGuffin is (http://dapsicouah.wikispaces.com/
and http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=ES&hl=es&v=s2IcOtspGSw
).
Por cierto, no sé por qué se resaltan algunas palabras. Antes de que alguien piense que se trata de un juego de algún tipo, no... no sé por qué ocurre... lo juro...
ResponderEliminarLo ponto en este color porque es la única manera para que se pudiera leer bien...
ResponderEliminar